I think Haberman does a very good helpin the reader visualize this pilgrimage. Yes, I do personally find this religion confusing, but only because the concept of pilgrimaging is foreign to me. However, I do respect the way in which these people take joy in the suffering that they experience. They know that it will bring them to their true destiny. This could be related back to Christianity too because these are the same things that God tell His followers to do: To bless Him even through the suffering. Then will you be truly blessed. Haberman is also very expressive and not shy of the emotions which is something that I never took away from Smith because he was so focused on the broad picture. I do respect this religion in the sacrifice and the devotion it takes to embark on a journey like this one. Even though I do not practice these beliefs, it is something that could be translated over into Christianity by means of worshiping and spreading the message of God and in return, God gives you peace and direction.
If you’re anything like me, then you probably would feel more than a little uncomfortable with the idea of someone sitting right outside your window right now, looking into your home, and watching every move you make. It’s like that song by The Police, except it’s not Sting who’s got his eye on you, and it isn’t over in two and a half minutes. Rather, it’s large, privately-owned corporations who are doing the snooping. And they don’t do it by stalking you around in a completely blacked-out Cadillac Escalade. Using the internet, companies have begun the practice of virtually tracking users, as a way of gathering data on persons generally without their consent or knowing of the situation. This data collection doesn’t come in the way of surveys or questionnaires, just straight-forward, blunt, peeping into the lives of the population. This calls into question dubious legal issues and the ever leering balance of morality that seems to always be in a state of suspicious motivation. (Though usually it’s a safe bet to go ahead and assume that the motive is usually money over anything else) The most concerning aspect of this sort of manipulation of the law, is the Orwellian way in which a government power could abuse these tactics of intrusion.
When discussing this topic in the Intro to Mass Communications class, I was really kind of appalled by how much of a wash the topic was. It seemed as though either very few cared, or the majority of my peers were just ambivalent and accepting of this development. I recall, in fact, that one of my fellow students actually agreed to the notion that we as citizens are not to feel secure in their own digital lives, inferring that privacy in the modern age is something more akin to a privilege than a right. And though it is technically true to that there is no constitutional backing to internet protection. I would assume that is because the INTERNET DID NOT EXIST WHEN THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN. I honestly feel that some people have begun to just give up when it comes to corporate takeover. What can be done? Money is god, and the companies have all the money – using it to advance their own agendas in Congress (lobbying) to benefit only themselves. This is a train wreck waiting to happen. And though this is becoming to sound somewhat tangential to the argument concerning privacy in their lives, it really is a big part of it. Because clearly some sort of reform needs to made to protect the people’s interests, not those of the white men in suits.
The most ironic aspect of this happening is the fact that even in our textbook, (Media and Culture, pg. 557) is that there is a section concerning the journalistic code to uphold a person’s right to privacy, when addressing the media’s usage of “unauthorized tape recording, photographing, wiretapping…” This clearly shows a level of hypocrisy and a lack of understanding amongst people concerning what rights they do have. Te Electronics Communicatons Privacy Act of 1986 is also addressed, which clearly states how people should not be intruded on, even virtually, but thanks to he PATRIOT Act of 2001, the government gets to decide with more malleability what that can translate to.
Scarier than a puppeted government, however, is the ramifications that the U.S. government can have if the whole debacle concerning Yahoo and its refusal to hand over the data of its users. The NRA as an institution is an utter joke. Basically serving the role of a second, more-disorganized, overwhelmed (due to the sheer amounts of data it collects) CIA, the NRA brings little to the table in terms of any sort of national security, and comes off more like a probing finger in a crowd of people. It’s there, and it’s annoying. And more rules need to be set in place to determine what is and isn’t okay to do on the internet. If I personally went through your computer files, sifting through all your history to serve my own mysterious purposes, you would consider me a hacker. Why are large corporations (yet again) and the government being let off the hook for otherwise illegal activities and not being held up to a higher standard.
Freshman Eddy Arnold shares his preferences regarding social media
Media convergence is something that has been happening since the beginning of journalism. Media convergence deals with the way news, stories, etc. are presented to its consumers. The way we receive our information has drastically changed lately. We have transitioned from newspapers and magazines to the radio and television to online sources that we can pull up on our smart phones and tablets.
The transition from one media outlet to another has been something that most people hardly notice. Each time a new outlet arises the older ones slowly trail off, but no one really seems to care much. I think that with this technology age it has really effected how consumers view the news. With the accessibility that the internet allows us we can view things we never had a chance of viewing before. We have live footage of events that we only could picture. We see and hear and read about the harsh truth of the word. At the same time, we also see wonderful things that the world has to offer through the swipe of our fingertips. We are able to make comments on reports and see real world opinions. The limit almost does not exist of what we can obtain and do within the media and how we are able to access the information.
The power within the consumers hands almost scares me. I feel as if the media can easy take control of our thoughts with a single post, with how instant everything is. I think with the easiness media convergence has created we may run into more trouble than we had originally thought.